Tuesday 24 November 2015

Disclaimer: I am not a doctor! But I'm going to talk to you about surgery and medications anyway. Don't try this at home.

Hello again! I submitted a paper on Sunday (my second paper for this course which will count toward my marks/grade). We are heading toward the end of the first semester. It is a really busy time, and I have assignments to work on, but I'm taking a little break from assignments to write this blog post.


I had a really fascinating lecture on post-operative pain today.


'There's a debate about whether animals feel pain?!' exclaimed my friend when I mentioned an earlier pain lecture. My friend is studying art and grew up with pet cats. She was shocked and appalled to hear that anyone would question whether animals feel pain because it is so obvious to her that they can. She laughed as I tried to explain the fact that, yes, quite a lot of very educated people have argued that animals don't feel pain.
There was also time - the 1980s - when American medical doctors didn't believe that baby humans felt pain and performed open heart surgery on babies without anaesthesia or analgesia (pain medication). Those babies grew up to have problems later in life and those doctors were sued by very angry mothers. The babies couldn't tell the doctors that the surgery hurt because they were too young to know how to talk, and the doctors didn't notice behaviours the babies performed that would indicate that they were in pain.


Now, lets go back in history prior to that strange time in the 1980s to the 1800s.


Prior to the invention of anaesthesia, surgery was performed. One woman wrote about her mastectomy, performed in 1811 without any anaesthesia, and she said, as you might guess, that it really hurt.
I should mention that there was a time just after this when really cruel vivisection became trendy and rich white dudes started nailing their dogs to their tables and cutting them open while they were awake. The world gained knowledge about anatomy, but anaesthesia was being invented at the time and it would have been nicer for those dogs if they had been given some anaesthesia.*


In the 1840s, anaesthesia started being used for surgery.
When we Americans tell dark jokes about 'doing Civil War medicine' its actually incorrect/ironic because the time period during the American Civil War was the first time in history that 'best practices' like anaesthesia began.


In North America, Ether was the anaesthetic of choice. In Britain Chloroform was the most popular.
Chloroform killed quite a few young people (they were probably anxious about their surgeries and had high heart rates and high heart rate and chloroform don't mix well). This lead to laws that only a Doctor could perform anaesthesia in the UK. The Ether used in America only killed old people and was safer, so in America, nurses were allowed to anaesthetize. This is still true, even in veterinary medicine. In the UK only Veterinarians are allowed to anaesthetize animal patients. In the USA Licensed Veterinary Technicians can anaesthetize, although a supervising Veterinarian should be present.


Morphine, Lidocaine and Ketamine were all invented pretty early in modern history. These are still the most important drugs to manage post-operative pain in veterinary medicine, but they are used in different ways now.


For a while veterinary surgery was performed on awake animals. This is kind of where this story ends for farm animals who still routinely have surgeries without anaesthesia or analgesia.


Later, drugs were given to make dogs immobile so surgery was easier for the veterinarian (and for the poor assistants who had been holding down awake animals during surgery). Other drugs could be given to reverse the effect of the immobilizing drugs and wake up the dog. This was helpful for the people performing the surgery, but didn't really help the dog.


There is a natural pain response that is part of our bodies which helps us survive. Part of this is the stress response involving adrenaline. Part of this involves endogenous opiods (natural opiods in the brain that help stop you from feeling pain). This natural pain response is what gives soldiers the ability to keep fighting on the battlefield even if they have been badly wounded. It helps animals survive in the wild after being attacked by predators.


Unfortunately, when veterinarians were first using opiods to immobilize their canine patients during surgery, they would use an opiod-reversing medication to wake up the dog after surgery. This medication reversed natural endogenous opiods too. If the endogenous opiods are stopped by a reversal drug then the animal will not have the natural response to manage pain and the dog will likely feel more pain than if the surgery had been performed while the dog was awake.


(I'm writing this as if we've totally left this practice in the past and all veterinarians in the world are using better drug protocols now, but unfortunately that is not entirely true.)


Currently, it is best practice to use a variety of different types of analgesics and anaesthetics to manage pain in a multi-modal way.


Here is the most important word that I have learned from my biology of suffering pain lectures: SENSITIZATION

If you are a veterinarian or animal researcher I recommend reading about sensitization because it is really fascinating. I might write another post about the bio-mechanics of this process, but it is neuroscience heavy and I might lose some people if I do that now.


Very, very basically, sensitization is this crazy thing that happens in the body that makes pain more painful over time. And it can start as soon as you start to cut a patient.


Wound -> nerve signalling & a the release of a bunch of chemicals -> pain + stress response


The 'nerve signalling & release of a bunch of chemicals' part repeats.


The body becomes more sensitive. The chemicals at the area of the wound make the skin look red and feel hot to the touch and make the areas near the wound more sensitive.
This can cause allodynia - which is when a gentle touch feels painful. Sensitization can cause chronic pain.


This processing is really weird and magical and problematic for veterinarians because it happens even when patients are anaesthetized. It  can cause patients to feel more pain later e.g. after the dog has had surgery and gone home.


Luckily, sensitization can be prevented with appropriate pre-surgical analgesia and/or local anaesthesic blocks like local nerve blocks.


In human medicine, women who were given general anaesthesia to immobilize them for C-section surgeries and muscle relaxants to make the surgery easier for the surgeon, sometimes reported pain and/or memories of the surgical procedure after they had gone home from hospital. These women had no clinical signs of waking up during the C-section (no elevated heart rate, etc.).
Women who were given epidurals - local anaesthetic nerve blocks - did not have this problem. The local nerve block stops central nervous system sensitization.


Pre-operative pain medication should be given to stop local sensitization and the build-up of the inflammatory response. For example, an NSAID could be given prior to surgery and the timing should be such that the NSAID is acting fully on the tissue being cut as the incision is first made.
My lecturer was a really big fan of 'splash-blocks' (Shout out to MO if you're reading this!) which is when a local anaesthetic like lidocaine is sprayed or squirted into the surgical site as the surgery is performed. He was also a big fan of nerve blocks and even nerve catheters which deliver local anaesthetic, again usually lidocaine, directly into the nerve near the surgical site. Finally, it is extremely important to give post-operative pain medication. Our lecturer recommended that post-operative pain medication be given until the wound is healed (5-30 days!) The reason it is so important to give post-op analgesia is that sensitization can start as soon as the pain medication given near the time of surgery wears off.


Sensitization can lead to really bad chronic pain.


Instead of acting like the doctors in the 1980s who did surgery on babies without pain management, we should give patients the benefit of the doubt and try to manage pain appropriately even if when can't verbally tell us how they feel.






*At least one of these dudes was yelled at by his wife for nailing their dog to their table and cutting the dog up, but he was all like, 'Shut up, I do what I want!' because he thought women were inferior to men just like dogs were inferior to men. Unfortunately, this dude was Descartes and he had a huge role in shaping modern Western thought.

Thursday 12 November 2015

Hello!

I'm so excited to be blogging about my experiences as a student in the MSc Applied Animal Behaviour and Animal Welfare programme at the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies at the University of Edinburgh. I know that you probably already know the title of my course if you are visiting this blog, but I love saying it because I spent so much time working toward my dream and goal of coming here, and I am so happy to be sitting in Dick Vet school right now typing this! :)


Since this is my first (ever) blog post, I'll start by telling you a bit about how I got here. Life is amazing chain of events and I love to think about how everything in my life lead me to be here....but I'll save the early life experiences for some other time. The first time I heard about Dick Vet, I was a Veterinary Assistant at an Exotics only veterinary practice, and I was reading a book about parrot behaviour. I later read more about Dick Vet and Edinburgh University research in American veterinary journals. I had also read great things about other veterinary research in Scotland in these journals like the pain assessment scale for companion animals which was developed in Glasgow.


I've been here since September, but it still is only just sinking in that I am actually here, doing this programme. I literally keep reminding myself that I'm sitting in front of veterinary learning models in the Dick Vet school study landscape while I'm typing.
Working as a Veterinary Assistant, there was a lot of dreaming of the magical, mythical place called Vet Schools where exceptional people could go to become Doctors or Scientists.


Luckily, everyone here is much more down to earth than I ever imagined that Scientists working in a Vet School could be. The wonderful scientists and professors who present lectures to me spend a great deal of time actually deconstructing this idea that scientists or even science is perfect.
We've spent a lot of time talking about how scientists are human and how there is no escaping the fact that these humans doing science are coming from a certain cultural, ethical, or political background when planning their studies and interpreting their findings. Our lecture on Ethics emphasized the point that to do good science, it is important to be clear, honest and transparent about your ethical views and explain them up-front, as well as explain other views.


The field of Animal Welfare Science (and yes, that is a real, experimental, scientific field for any of you who started to panic when you read the word 'Welfare' right next to the word 'Science')* has its roots in the 1960s in Britain when a book about intensive farming caused the public to get the government to address that issue. The government founded the Brambell Committee which included scientists, who decided that animals were sentient/capable of suffering, and animal welfare should be assessed scientifically. This concept of addressing animal suffering scientifically is really interesting because it occurred while reductionist behaviourism was popular (behaviourists argued that scientists should not address internal, mental states of animals or people) but, in order to start doing Animal Welfare Science research you have to find a way to assess internal states of animals, such as suffering or distress. It is a dilemma that will make you go crazy if you think about it too much, and I've been spending a lot of time thinking about it do much. Add to my dilemma that I have studied psychology and I became interested in this master's degree because of classes taught by an old-school behaviourist. I have also studied animal behaviour, welfare and ethics with students of B.F. Skinner, the founder of behaviourism.


The scientist in the Brambell committee who said we should approach animal welfare issues scientifically...which sounds like a great idea because even behaviourists think that science is the best way of finding information to solve problems...was an ethologist. I don't have a background in ethology, but some students in my course have been taught by great ethologists.


The point I'm trying to make is that my lecturers and the scientists in this field are forced to question the history, philosophy, and ethics of science before they can begin to conduct research.


I did not expect to be learning about these issues or to have my entire world-view turned on its head multiple times when I started this course. It is very enlightening. I think I'm lucky to be in a field of science where the status quo is rigorously questioned.


A big part of higher education is to have your mind opened and to become a critical thinker.


*Animal Behaviour Science is also a real, experimental scientific field despite that one Imposter Syndrome nightmare I had in which people yelled at me that animal behaviour science was not a real science and smart people studied molecules, which was terrifying but also pretty silly. I'm obviously an amazingly smart Scientist because I'm studying at a Dick Vet School (I've clearly learned how to make really impressive circular arguments. lol.)